How Many Suppliers Are Involved in Producing a Garment? Why the Factory Isn’t the Only Answer

When a consumer picks up a piece of sportswear, whether it’s a high-performance running top, a pair of compression leggings or a waterproof jacket, the natural assumption is that it was made entirely inside a single factory. The garment has a “Made in…” label, after all, so it must be the work of one facility. But the reality of sportswear manufacturing is far more complex and understanding that complexity is key for brands that want to deliver consistently high-quality produced garments.

In truth, the factory is only one part of an extensive garment production process. It is not the source of every material, component or technology that goes into the final product. Instead, the factory behaves much like a builder on a construction site: assembling materials provided by a wide network of specialist suppliers. No builder manufactures their own bricks, windows, tiles and wiring; they bring these elements together into a cohesive structure. A garment factory operates in exactly the same way.

A single garment can involve anywhere from eight to more than twenty different suppliers, each providing a specific element that determines the performance, comfort, aesthetic appeal and durability of the final product. These suppliers range from performance fabric mills to trim manufacturers, zip producers, thread specialists, labelling printers, embroidery houses, print technicians, packaging suppliers, and many more. Each plays a crucial role in quality control, compliance, sustainability and ultimately the brand’s reputation.

Understanding how this ecosystem works is essential for any brand seeking to improve supply chain transparency, enhance garment quality or optimise production timelines. It challenges the idea that “factory sourcing” is the whole story and highlights the importance of selecting the right partners across every stage of the supply chain.

The Complex Network Behind a Single Garment

If you were to take apart a technical sportswear garment, you would quickly realise that almost nothing inside it was made by the factory itself. The stitchers and production teams focus on assembly, but the raw materials all come from external specialists.

The most influential of these suppliers, and the most significant cost driver, is the fabric mill. Performance fabrics require a level of engineering comparable to that found in outdoor gear or elite sports equipment. Mills design fabrics that offer moisture-wicking properties, compression, four-way stretch, antibacterial coatings, UV protection, brushed comfort, recycled yarns and fully traceable supply chains. The factory doesn’t knit or weave these fabrics; it sources them. The mill’s expertise determines the breathability, durability, stretch recovery, colourfastness, pilling resistance and overall feel of the garment. A poor-quality fabric can undermine even the most advanced pattern cutting and sewing techniques, making fabric selection one of the most strategic decisions a brand can make.

Just as critical are the trim suppliers. Trims include elastics, bindings, drawcords, reflective details, reinforcements and many other components that give sportswear its functionality. For example, the elastic in the waistband of a pair of leggings affects comfort, fit, longevity and even the silhouette of the garment. Reflective trims are essential for running gear designed for low light conditions, and poor-quality reflective materials can crack, fade or detach after laundering. Reinforcement patches help strengthen high-stress areas on outerwear or cycle apparel. Each trim typically comes from a different manufacturer, often one that specialises in a specific category. Their capabilities, certifications and quality standards directly affect the final product.

Labels also come from external specialists. Modern garments may use woven labels, printed labels, heat transfers, swing tags, care and content labels or even RFID tags for inventory tracking. High-performance heat transfers, for example, require precise temperature resistance and stretch recovery so they don’t crack or peel. Labels are more than branding; they must meet compliance laws, withstand repeated washing and align with a brand’s sustainability commitments. A factory may apply labels, but it rarely produces them.

Packaging suppliers are another essential part of the sportswear supply chain. Every garment must be packed individually before shipping, whether it uses poly bags, biodegradable alternatives, recycled packaging, swing tags, barcodes or bespoke branded boxes. Packaging affects sustainability credentials, warehouse efficiency, visual merchandising and the consumer’s perception of quality. A brand committed to eco-friendly practices must ensure packaging suppliers follow the same standards.

Zips, often taken for granted, are among the most technically demanding components in sportswear manufacturing. Leading brands rely on companies like YKK for durability, smooth operation and long-term reliability. A faulty zip can ruin an otherwise excellent garment. Factories virtually never produce zips themselves; they rely on dedicated, highly specialised suppliers.

The same is true for hardware such as studs, snaps, toggles, buckles and cord locks. These components are usually produced by manufacturers who invest in specific moulding technology, metal finishing, pressure testing and international compliance. Hardware influences the garment’s adjustability, functionality and perceived quality. A single cheap snap can fail after a few wears, tarnishing the overall experience.

Velcro, more accurately described as hook-and-loop fasteners, is another element manufactured outside the factory. Different qualities offer different grip strengths, cycle counts, edge stability and resistance to moisture or abrasion. These fasteners are commonly used in outdoor, cycle and military-inspired garments, where reliability is critical. The factory’s role is simply to attach them.

Even the thread that holds the garment together comes from specialist thread suppliers. These suppliers produce polyester core-spun thread, stretch nylon thread, bonded thread for heavy fabrics and recycled thread options. Thread quality determines seam strength, flexibility, resistance to breakage and overall garment longevity. Using the wrong thread type can lead to broken seams, puckering or poor elasticity, particularly in activewear designed for movement.

If the garment requires branding, embellishment or decoration, that introduces even more suppliers. Embroidery is often handled by external embroidery houses with specialised machinery capable of producing dense, durable designs without compromising fabric integrity. Printing, whether it’s screen printing, sublimation, heat transfer, silicone printing or textured effects, is also typically handled by dedicated print specialists. Print quality affects elasticity, vibrancy, longevity, wash resistance and the premium feel of the garment.

When you tally all these contributors, it becomes clear that garment manufacturing is not a single-source operation. Instead, it is a finely tuned collaboration between a wide ecosystem of suppliers, each bringing expert knowledge and precision engineering to their specific component. The total number of suppliers involved can easily reach twenty or more for a single piece of apparel, particularly in the world of technical sportswear where fabrics and trims are increasingly advanced.

Why the Factory Alone Doesn't Determine Quality

Given the number of specialists involved, it becomes clear that the factory is not the sole determinant of garment quality. A factory’s craftsmanship is vital, but it can only work with the materials it is given. Even the most skilled production team cannot turn substandard fabrics or trims into a premium garment.

This is why brands that invest in supply chain transparency and strategic sourcing tend to achieve more consistent results. The work of selecting, testing and approving mills, trim suppliers, hardware producers, thread manufacturers and printing partners is just as important as selecting the factory itself. A factory may be excellent at assembly, but its ability to deliver high-quality garments depends on the quality of every component in the supply chain.

The builder analogy is especially useful here. A builder constructs a house, but the materials determine the strength, insulation, sustainability and aesthetic of the finished property. The same applies to factories: they assemble garments, but the components dictate performance. A premium factory cannot compensate for poor-quality zips, low-grade thread, weak elastic or fabrics that pill after a few washes. Conversely, excellent materials paired with mediocre assembly can also undermine quality. Both must align.

What This Means for Brands and Retailers

For brands focused on quality, sustainability and ethical manufacturing, the implications are significant. It means that garment development must start long before the factory receives a purchase order. It requires building long-term relationships with mills, trim partners and embellishment specialists, ensuring every supplier meets the brand’s standards for durability, performance, compliance and sustainability. It also means ongoing testing, from fabric hand-feel and stretch recovery to zip cycle counts and print wash resistance.

Supply chain transparency is increasingly important to consumers and retailers. Understanding the number of suppliers involved allows brands to communicate more openly about where materials come from, how they are produced and what makes their garments superior. It also builds resilience, ensuring alternative suppliers can be used if disruptions occur.

Final Thoughts: Garments Are the Product of Collaboration

A sportswear garment is far more than the output of a single factory. It is the result of collaboration across a wide, interconnected supply chain, from technical fabric mills to embellishment specialists, packaging partners and hardware manufacturers. The factory plays a vital role, but it is only one part of a much larger process. For brands that want to produce high-quality, consistent and ethically manufactured apparel, understanding and managing this network of suppliers is essential.

In conclusion, there are many suppliers involved in producing a garment if you want to create an optimal high-quality result. When creating a house, you wouldn't ask the builders to source the materials as they would source the cheapest ones. Instead, the architect or designer would source quality materials. This is why we don't ask the garment factory to source all of the components for a garment, and instead we source them all individually from various suppliers which specialise in their own area and therefore do it well. Sourcing from many different suppliers helps create a more premium and higher quality result, whilst the factory simply pulls these all together and constructs the garment much like the builder of a house.

At Blue Associates Sportswear, we oversee this entire ecosystem, ensuring every component, from the fabric to the smallest trim, is sourced from trusted, high-quality suppliers. By controlling every stage of the supply chain, we help brands achieve unmatched quality, reliability and performance in their garments.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.